The New York Convention and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

The New York Convention and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
is the cornerstone
of the international trade and cross-border investment framework; it ensures that investors and companies
can have arbitral awards rendered in one State recognized and enforced in another State with flexibility
and effectiveness.

For
foreign investors, multinational companies, shipping, import and export companies,
as well as international law firms whose clients’ matters require the presence of Local Counsel in Egypt, understanding the mechanisms for applying this
Convention before the Egyptian courts represents a critical element in managing legal
and financial risks and protecting assets.

The Legal Framework of the New York Convention and Its Application
in Egypt

The Convention
on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, known as the 1958 New York Convention, is the most prominent international treaty in
the field of international commercial arbitration. The Arab Republic of Egypt acceded to the Convention pursuant to
Presidential Decree No. 171 of 1959, making its provisions part of the Egyptian legal
system and giving them priority in application over the general rules of the Civil and
Commercial Procedures Law.

This
framework integrates with Egyptian Arbitration Law No. 27 of 1994 on civil and commercial matters,
particularly Article (1) and Articles (52) through (58), which regulate the procedures and conditions
for obtaining an enforcement order. Pursuant to Article 55 of the Egyptian Arbitration Law, arbitral awards rendered
in accordance with the law have res judicata effect and are enforceable subject to the formal
and substantive requirements prescribed by law.

Requirements and Practical Procedures for Enforcing Foreign
Arbitral Awards in Egypt

To enforce a foreign
arbitral award rendered in a State party to the New York Convention within Egyptian territory, a
specific procedural route must be followed before the competent Egyptian courts, usually before the Cairo Court of Appeal
or the court originally having jurisdiction depending on the nature of the dispute.

1. Documents Required Under Article 4 of the
New York Convention

• The original arbitral award or a certified true copy thereof satisfying the
  procedural requirements and official authentications, including the required authentications from the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  and the relevant embassy.
• The original arbitration agreement, whether an arbitration clause or a submission agreement, or a certified true copy thereof.
• An official certified translation into Arabic of the arbitral award and arbitration
  agreement if they were issued in a foreign language.

2. Filing the Award and Applying for an Enforcement Order

• Filing the original
  award and certified translation with the registry of the competent court.
• Submitting an application
  for an enforcement order to the president of the competent court or a judge delegated by the president.
• Confirming that
  the time limit for bringing an action to set aside the award, if applicable, has expired, or that the award has become final in accordance with the law
  of the State in which the award was rendered or the law governing the arbitration.

Grounds for Refusing Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award Under
Article 5 of the New York Convention

Article
Five of the Convention exhaustively specifies the circumstances in which a local court may
refuse recognition or enforcement of a foreign award. These grounds are divided between defenses that
must be proven by the party against whom enforcement is sought and grounds that the court may raise on its own motion.

Grounds to Be Proven by the Respondent
(the Party Against Whom Enforcement Is Sought)

1. Incapacity of the parties or invalidity of the arbitration agreement: The parties lacked capacity to contract under the applicable
   law, or the arbitration agreement itself is invalid.
2. Violation of the right of defense: The opposing party was not properly notified of the appointment
   of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings, or was unable to present its defense for reasons beyond its control.
3. The arbitrators exceeded the scope of their jurisdiction: The award went beyond the matters submitted to arbitration,
   or included matters not covered by the arbitration clause.
4. Invalid constitution of the arbitral tribunal or proceedings: The constitution of the tribunal or the proceedings did not comply with what the
   parties agreed, or with the law of the country where the arbitration took place.
5. The award has not become binding or has been set aside: If the award has not yet become binding on the parties, or
   if it has been set aside or suspended by the competent authority in the country in which it was made.

Grounds Considered by the Court on Its Own Motion (Ex officio)

1. Non-arbitrability of the dispute: If the subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration
   under Egyptian law, such as certain matters relating to personal status or rights
   that are not capable of settlement.
2. Violation of Public Policy (Public Policy): If enforcement of the award conflicts with the rules of
   public policy or public morals in the Arab Republic of Egypt.

Legal Risks and Commercial Implications for
Companies

• Local public policy risks: A foreign party may face an objection based on violation of
  public policy due to an inaccurate assessment of the concept of public policy in Egypt, which may prolong
  the litigation.
• Attachment of assets: Failure to act promptly to seek protective measures
  may allow the party against whom enforcement is sought to dispose of assets or transfer liquidity outside the scope
  of enforcement.
• Prolongation of procedural disputes: The raising of formal and procedural defenses by the party against whom enforcement
  is sought before the Egyptian courts may delay the actual recovery of debts and commercial
  returns.

Considerations for International Clients
and Foreign Law Firms
(Local Counsel)

When dealing
with the enforcement of international arbitral awards in Egypt, international companies and cross-border law firms
need to consider a number of matters beginning with the drafting of the arbitration agreement
and extending through the stage of enforcement against assets.

• Precise drafting of the arbitration clause: Avoid ambiguous or misleading wording that may
  later be exploited to challenge enforcement or allege invalidity of the arbitration clause.
• Determining the seat of arbitration (Seat of Arbitration): Carefully distinguish between the legal seat of the arbitration
  and the physical venue at which the proceedings are conducted.
• Ability to trace assets within Egypt: Verify at an early stage the existence of assets or bank accounts
  against which enforcement can be pursued in the Egyptian market before continuing with enforcement proceedings.

Common Mistakes and Practical Best Practices

Common Mistakes

• Submitting documents
  with uncertified or legally inaccurate translations.
• Failing to obtain
  the official authentications and complete consular legalization chain for documents issued abroad.
• Failing to examine
  whether the subject matter of the dispute involves administrative contracts requiring special approvals under Egyptian
  legislation.

Best Practices

• Prompt filing
  of the arbitral award with the registry of the competent court once issued and after satisfying the required
  authentications.
• Taking
  parallel protective measures to safeguard assets and financial entitlements.
• Engaging Local Counsel with extensive experience in applying the New York Convention
  and the relevant judgments of the Egyptian Court of Cassation.

When Is the Intervention of a Specialized Lawyer or Local Counsel in Egypt Required?

The importance
of engaging
El Rouby Law Firm as Local Counsel in Egypt becomes apparent when
moving from the arbitral award stage to the stage of actual recognition and enforcement.

• When commencing
  the filing of foreign arbitral awards and obtaining enforcement orders from Egyptian courts.
• To address
  formal and substantive defenses raised by the opposing party relating to public policy or invalidity
  of the proceedings.
• To provide
  preventive legal advice and draft arbitration clauses in cross-border commercial contracts in a manner
  that supports their future enforceability.
• To manage asset
  searches, compulsory enforcement, and protective attachment over funds and property within Egypt.

How Can Specialized Legal Support Help?

El Rouby Law
Firm provides an integrated legal
framework to support local and international companies throughout the various stages of international arbitration and the enforcement
of arbitral awards.

• Regulatory compliance and risk management: Assessing the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards
  in Egypt before proceedings begin, helping to save time and costs.
• Contract drafting and dispute prevention: Drafting balanced arbitration submission agreements and clauses compatible
  with the requirements of the New York Convention and Egyptian law, to avoid deficiencies that may obstruct enforcement.
• Negotiation and settlement: Leveraging arbitral awards to reach
  amicable and effective commercial settlements that bring the dispute to an end.
• Representation before Egyptian authorities and courts: Following up on filing procedures and obtaining enforcement orders,
  responding to procedural defenses, and completing compulsory enforcement before the Courts of Appeal
  and the competent enforcement departments.

Conclusion and Contact Us

Success in
obtaining an international arbitral award is only complete when it is actually enforced and the commercial
and financial rights are recovered. Dealing with the
New York Convention
and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
requires institutional legal
expertise combining knowledge of international law with an understanding of local judicial practice.

If you are seeking
to enforce a foreign arbitral award in Egypt, or wish to assess your legal position and identify
assets against which enforcement may be pursued, you can contact the team of legal advisers and experts at El Rouby Law
Firm to obtain
specialized legal advice and professional procedural support.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Does Egypt Apply the 1958 New York Convention to
All Foreign Arbitral Awards?

Yes, Egypt acceded
to the New York Convention in 1959, and Egyptian courts are required to recognize and enforce arbitral awards
rendered in member States, subject to the requirements of Article Five and provided that
the award does not violate Egyptian public policy.

Which Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant an Enforcement Order for a
Foreign Arbitral Award in Egypt?

Jurisdiction
lies with the President of the Cairo Court of Appeal or the court originally having jurisdiction depending on the nature
of the dispute, pursuant to Egyptian Arbitration Law No. 27 of 1994.

May the Merits of the Dispute Be Reconsidered When
Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award Is Sought in Egypt?

No, the
Egyptian judge competent to grant the enforcement order may not reconsider the merits of the dispute; the judge’s role is limited
to verifying the legal and procedural requirements, ensuring that the award does not violate public policy
and that there has been no violation of the right of defense.

What Are the Basic Documents Required to Apply for Enforcement of
a Foreign Arbitral Award?

The original
arbitral award or a certified copy thereof, the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy,
an official certified Arabic translation, and completion of the required official authentications must be submitted.

What Is the Most Common Defense Used to Obstruct Enforcement of a
Foreign Arbitral Award in Egypt?

Among the most
common defenses are that the award violates Egyptian public policy, or that
the respondent was not properly notified of the arbitration proceedings in a manner that safeguarded its right of defense.

---

References

• Egyptian Arbitration Law No. 27 of 1994, as amended.
• Egyptian Civil and Commercial Procedures Law
  No. 13 of 1968
  (Compulsory Enforcement
  Chapter).
• Egyptian Court of Cassation (established judicial principles concerning the independence of
  companies’ financial estates and orders for enforcement of arbitral awards).
• Central Bank of Egypt (instructions and procedures governing the implementation of
  judicial attachments over bank accounts).
• Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral
  Awards (1958 New York Convention).